On 18/05/12 12:40, Marek Potociar wrote:
> Please remind me: Did we arrive to any conclusion of what the value
> should be in that case?
>
> I m particularly curious for use-cases when an empty @Path annotation is
> applied to:
>
> - resource class
> - sub-resource method
> - sub-resource locator
>
And what would be the difference between @Path("") and Path() with no
value at all. What is CoC anyway :-) ?
Thanks, Sergey
> Marek
>
> On May 17, 2012, at 5:13 PM, Bill Burke wrote:
>
>> Unrelated: Any way you can make the value() of @Path optional so we
>> can start prototyping CoC based on discussions we had last year?
>