users@jax-rs-spec.java.net

[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Re: Re: Default Servlet Mapping?

From: Bill Burke <bburke_at_redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 16:00:24 -0400

On 3/15/12 3:54 PM, Santiago Pericas-Geertsen wrote:
>
> On Mar 15, 2012, at 3:31 PM, Bill Burke wrote:
>
>> I would say do nothing because it would break existing 1.1 applications when deployed.
>
> How so? Before you had to always specify the mapping, and that will continue to take precedence. Can you elaborate?
>
We assumed everything could be scanned, you could have an empty web.xml
file, and no Application class. This was an incorrect assumption? I
know a lot of people use us in this manner. Maybe I just interpreted
the 1.1 spec wrong?

Bill

-- 
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com