jsr370-experts@jax-rs-spec.java.net

RE: JSR 370 Updated Schedule

From: Markus KARG <markus_at_headcrashing.eu>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 23:44:12 +0200

Yes, implicitly you suggested not to use Java 8 features, as your proposal
would only work if we would know beforehand the result of the API changes
needed for each planned feature, whether they might need Java 8 APIs or not.
Hence I do not see that as a realistic option unless anybody can anticipate
that for one particular feature Java 8 APIs are definitively not an option.


-----Original Message-----
From: Sergey Beryozkin [mailto:sberyozkin_at_talend.com]
Sent: Dienstag, 21. April 2015 22:04
To: jsr370-experts_at_jax-rs-spec.java.net
Subject: Re: JSR 370 Updated Schedule

Of course if all the 2.1 features will absolutely need Java 8 then so be it,
my point basically is that if we start from Java 8 and yet some 2.1 features
won't actually depend on Java 8 then I reckon the adoption of
2.1 will be prolonged...
That said - may be some people still considering migrating from 1.1 to
2.0 :-), so I don;t know...

Sergey


On 21/04/15 20:50, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
> Have I suggested not to use Jave 8 features ? I don't think so...
> Sergey
>
>
> On 21/04/15 17:25, Markus KARG wrote:
>> This might lead to worse API choices as it constraints us to not use
>> new Java 8 features.
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Sergey Beryozkin [mailto:sberyozkin_at_talend.com]
>> Sent: Dienstag, 21. April 2015 12:59
>> To: jsr370-experts_at_jax-rs-spec.java.net
>> Subject: Re: JSR 370 Updated Schedule
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> As I've suggested earlier, it might make sense to start from working
>> on JAX-RS 2.1 features that can still run with JDK 1.7 - simply to
>> make the adoption of 2.1 faster for the existing JDK 1.7 users and
>> get the features depending on Java 8 language features in the
>> end/second half of the 2.1 development life-cycle. Not sure how
>> realistic it is though
>>
>> Sergey
>>
>> On 13/04/15 20:42, Santiago Pericas-Geertsen wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Apr 13, 2015, at 1:21 PM, Markus KARG <markus_at_headcrashing.eu
>>>> <mailto:markus_at_headcrashing.eu>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Santiago,
>>>> can you please publish an updated schedule for JSR 370 as the
>>>> original scheduled apparently is void already. It says there is an
>>>> early draft in Q1/2015 and PR in Q3/2015, which apparently does not
>>>> exist.
>>>
>>> I will, once I get a chance to review it with Marek.
>>>
>>>> Also I'd like to ask for clarification on Java 8: Will the new API
>>>> support Lambdas and Streams, hence make the use of Java SE 8 mandatory?
>>>
>>> Possibly. We certainly want to take advantage of SE 8 features,
>>> but we also feel that by the time EE 8 is out, SE 8 will be the
>>> mainstream version. As a data point, I believe Oracle will not
>>> provide any more public updates of SE 7 after this month.
>>>
>>> - Santiago
>>>
>>
>>
>
>


--
Sergey Beryozkin
Talend Community Coders
http://coders.talend.com/
Blog: http://sberyozkin.blogspot.com