On 19/09/12 14:21, Santiago Pericas-Geertsen wrote:
> Hi Sergey,
>
> On Sep 18, 2012, at 4:38 PM, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
>
>> Application name-bindings do apply to providers this Application provides (filters, interceptors).
>>
>> What is the rule when some of the providers have their own name-bindings ? Do they end up with their own name-bindings + those belonging to Application ?
>
> Not sure I understand the use case you have in mind. Could you elaborate or show an example?
Well, I'm not exactly proposing anything yet, first of all I'd like to
understand the default rules.
Do provider-specific name-bindings are ignored or preferred when
Application class which enables these providers has its own name bindings ?
Sergey
>
> -- Santiago
>
>