I'm fine either way. You guys go and debate and let me know which name won :)
Marek
On Aug 22, 2012, at 7:28 PM, Markus KARG <markus_at_headcrashing.eu> wrote:
> I actually thought the sense is to convert anything to / from String. So
> StringConverter was a rather good name in my opinion.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Marek Potociar [mailto:marek.potociar_at_oracle.com]
>> Sent: Mittwoch, 22. August 2012 15:28
>> To: jsr339-experts_at_jax-rs-spec.java.net
>> Subject: [jsr339-experts] Re: FYI: StringConverter API added.
>>
>> Makes sense.
>>
>> Renamed to ParamConverter/ParamConverterProvider
>>
>> Marek
>>
>> On Aug 22, 2012, at 12:12 PM, Sergey Beryozkin <sberyozkin_at_talend.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Can we consider renaming 'String' part to 'Parameter':
>>> ParameterConverter,
>>> ParameterConverterProvider
>>>
>>> IMHO that will better reflect that the goal of the provider is to
>>> facilitate the parameter conversion, as opposed to say message
>>> conversion
>>>
>>> Sergey
>>>
>>> On 21/08/12 19:13, Marek Potociar wrote:
>>>> Hello *,
>>>>
>>>> A new extension provider API was added to resolve issue
>>>> http://java.net/jira/browse/JAX_RS_SPEC-61.
>>>> Please review the StringConverter API proposal here:
>>>> http://java.net/projects/jax-rs-
>> spec/sources/git/revision/fec40bf58cf
>>>> 8ba85f8a4ee8ab139710c0c19e1b5
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Marek
>>>>
>>>
>
>