jsr339-experts@jax-rs-spec.java.net

[jsr339-experts] Re: Pre-Matching Filters?

From: Markus KARG <markus_at_headcrashing.eu>
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2011 17:45:59 +0100

For the sake of completeness and flexibility I would say: Yes.

Currently I actually do not have a real use case for that as all OUR filters
only deal with entity content, but in fact, the filters we are applying
currently ARE pre-matching ones, as they are implemented as ServletFilters.
So I could imagine that "out there" some filters will exists, which do what
you describe. So why not doing it?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Santiago Pericas-Geertsen
> [mailto:Santiago.PericasGeertsen_at_oracle.com]
> Sent: Dienstag, 25. Oktober 2011 21:55
> To: jsr339-experts_at_jax-rs-spec.java.net
> Subject: [jsr339-experts] Pre-Matching Filters?
>
> Hello Experts,
>
> As you know, we already support filters as well as a few different
> ways in which they can be bound to resource classes and methods (by
> name or global/static or dynamic). However, all these filters are
> intended to be executed _after_ requests are matched to resource
> methods.
>
> There are some use cases in which requests need to be transformed
> _before_ the matching algorithm kicks off. An example of this is a
> filter that overrides the HTTP method, e.g. using X-HTTP-Method-
> Override. In a servlet environment, this could be achieved by using a
> servlet filter. But, of course, JAX-RS runs on many other environments.
>
> Should we look at supporting these type of pre-matching
> filters/transformers/routers? (Clearly, I don't have a good name for
> them yet).
>
> -- Santiago
>
>