Well, this depends on the API designed in JSR-107. If that fits well, we can
use it. But if not?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adam Bien [mailto:abien_at_adam-bien.com]
> Sent: Donnerstag, 16. Juni 2011 10:07
> To: jsr339-experts_at_jax-rs-spec.java.net
> Subject: [jsr339-experts] Re: ...and JSR-107 JCache?
>
> If we decide to support a cache solution, we should use JCache and rely
> on its semantics. We should not even think of doing it by us :-)
> On 15.06.2011, at 21:27, Bill Burke wrote:
>
> > Those are just examples of using interceptors/filters, not part of
> the spec. At least that's what Marek said.
> >
> > On 6/15/11 2:27 PM, Adam Bien wrote:
> >> Hi RESTafaris,
> >>
> >> I just spotted the CacheEntry class in the
> jaxrs.examples.client.cache package. Shouldn't we just reuse the JSR-
> 107 JCache as internal implementation and delegate to it?
> >> It will become a part of the Java EE 7 spec anyway. IMHO we should
> avoid overlapping with other specs as much as possible.
> >>
> >> Just a spontaneous idea,
> >>
> >> cheers,
> >>
> >> adam
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > --
> > Bill Burke
> > JBoss, a division of Red Hat
> > http://bill.burkecentral.com
>