On 6/9/11 12:12 PM, Santiago Pericas-Geertsen wrote:
>
> On Jun 8, 2011, at 9:52 AM, Bill Burke wrote:
>
>>> Is this something we can specify in the javadoc for Invocation.getProperties() and BaseContext.getProperties()?
>>>
>>
>> Yes. But also I'd like to brainstorm a little bit more about this.
>>
>>
>> For example, maybe this is yet another way to bind an interceptor. An interceptor could get a callback with a properties map and decide whether or not to apply itself.
>
> What if we change the DynamicBinding interface as follows:
>
> public interface DynamicBinding<T extends BaseContext> {
> public boolean isBound(T ctx);
> }
>
> That'll give access to everything in the context. Incidentally, why did you use AccessibleObject as the return type of getAppliedTarget() in your original proposal?
>
I was thinking of something more that was a boot/deployment/init time thing.
public interface Feature {
void bind(Client client);
void bind(Client client, BaseContext ctx);
void bindServer(BaseContext ctx);
}
Or have 2 separete interfaces:
public interface ClientFeature {...}
public interface ServerFeature {...}
Maybre that makes more sense and would allow us to separate client and
server easier if we ever wanted JAX-RS client to be in JDK.
It would then look like:
clientConfigurate.getClasses().add(MyFeature.class);
or Application.getClasses() would return a MyFeature.class.
BTW, I noticed that Client doesn't have an registerClass()
registerSingleton(). I think this is something that would need to be added.
--
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com