I should've commented on the users list - to me initial resource URI is "resourceURI", links are little helpers to help the client navigate via the resource application state...
I guess we all can say "can you send me the link to that resource" though, but "resourceURI" reflects the nature of initial 'link' better IMHO. Anyway, it's later I guess
As a side note using something like Link to create Invocation and then using that invocation to do invoke() is complex and invoke() just does not read right and one step too much - I'm hoping to comment more on it a bit later on.
thanks, Sergey
________________________________________
From: Marek Potociar [marek.potociar_at_oracle.com]
Sent: 27 June 2011 12:35
To: jsr339-experts_at_jax-rs-spec.java.net
Subject: [jsr339-experts] Re: HEADS-UP: Vote for client-side glorified resource identifier class name
On 06/24/2011 04:13 PM, Marek Potociar wrote:
> Anyway, based on the results I am going to rename the ResourceUri to Link. Many thanks those 3 other members for their
> participation.
Renamed.
Marek