jsr339-experts@jax-rs-spec.java.net

[jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Proposal to downgrade [JAX_RS_SPEC-39] Client Cache Support to MINOR

From: Markus KARG <markus_at_headcrashing.eu>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 20:17:24 +0200

How shall an application do WORA then? You are enforcing proprietary apps. That is counterproductive to the idea of a Java EE standard.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill Burke [mailto:bburke_at_redhat.com]
> Sent: Freitag, 13. Mai 2011 13:35
> To: Marek Potociar
> Cc: jsr339-experts_at_jax-rs-spec.java.net; Markus KARG
> Subject: Re: [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Proposal
> to downgrade [JAX_RS_SPEC-39] Client Cache Support to MINOR
>
>
>
> On 5/13/11 6:34 AM, Marek Potociar wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 05/12/2011 07:43 PM, Markus KARG wrote:
> >> Agreed, but in a standalone client application the application's
> http transport provider is provided by the JAX RS Implementation, isn't
> it? How should an application enable caching then?
> >
> > Through a proprietary client provider API.
> >
>
> Or through proprietary properties.
>
> i.e.
>
> import javax.ws.rs.client.Client;
>
> Client c = new Client();
> c.setProperty("resteasy.client.cache", true);
>
>
> Bill
>
> --
> Bill Burke
> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
> http://bill.burkecentral.com