jsr339-experts@jax-rs-spec.java.net

[jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Proposal to downgrade [JAX_RS_SPEC-39] Client Cache Support to MINOR

From: Marek Potociar <marek.potociar_at_oracle.com>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 12:34:56 +0200

On 05/12/2011 07:43 PM, Markus KARG wrote:
> Agreed, but in a standalone client application the application's http transport provider is provided by the JAX RS Implementation, isn't it? How should an application enable caching then?

Through a proprietary client provider API.

Marek

>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Marek Potociar [mailto:marek.potociar_at_oracle.com]
>> Sent: Donnerstag, 12. Mai 2011 16:31
>> To: jsr339-experts_at_jax-rs-spec.java.net
>> Cc: Bill Burke
>> Subject: [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Proposal to
>> downgrade [JAX_RS_SPEC-39] Client Cache Support to MINOR
>>
>>
>>
>> On 05/12/2011 01:49 PM, Bill Burke wrote:
>>> Caches are essential, but they don't necessarily belong in the JAX-RS
>> specification.
>>
>> +1 for me it's actually one level down. The HTTP transport provider
>> should take care of that.
>>
>> Marek
>