On May 7, 2011, at 7:26 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> HTTP caches not only live in User Agents, but also in intermediaries. So it's definitively *possible* to write well-performing cache implementations (Squid comes to mind).
>
> That being said, caching is totally non-trivial; and having a broken cache implementation may be worse than not having a cache at all.
Yes, exactly. Possible but non-trivial is an accurate statement. I'm also skeptical about a single caching configuration that would work well for all use cases out of the box.
-- Santiago