users@jax-rpc.java.net

Re: Internal wscompile error from custom WSDL

From: Anne Thomas Manes <atmanes_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 May 2005 20:45:36 -0400

Ryan,

I recommend that you always use the wrapped convention. I also
recommend that you not use nillable="true", because that causes
interop problems. It's better to say minOccurs="0".

If you want your service to accept or return Item[] rather than Items,
then you must define the input element as a bare array rather than as
a wrapped array (i.e., don't create an Items type or an arrayOfItems
element). So for example, if you want the input message to accept
Item[], define it this way (this is identical to the way I told you to
describe the output message):

        <element name="handleItems">
          <complexType>
             <sequence>
                <element name="item" type="tns:Item"
                    minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
             </sequence>
          </complexType>
       </element>

For more information about arrays, I suggest you visit this site:
http://wiki.apache.org/ws/DotNetInteropArrays
(it's about Axis, but it applies to any JAX-RPC implementation)

Anne

On 5/5/05, Ryan LeCompte <ryan.lecompte_at_pangonetworks.com> wrote:
> Anne,
>
> I was able to follow your suggestion about the return type and I now see the
> return type of the handleItems method to be Item[] instead of the "Items"
> object. I basically added on to Doug's modified Test wsdl where he wanted to
> show me how I could achieve multiple parameters with doc/literal. The
> current Test.wsdl (which is attached) generates the handleItems method with
> two arguments. However, the first argument is generated as type "Items"
> where ideally it should be "Item[]", just like the return type. Any ideas
> why it wouldn't be Item[]?
>
> Also, a more general question.... should I follow the doc/literal "wrapped"
> convention even if I'm not writing an operation with "multiple arguments"? I
> did this in a previous WSDL even though it was only taking a single array
> type argument, and it has worked out fine.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Ryan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anne Thomas Manes [mailto:atmanes_at_gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 4:47 PM
> To: users_at_jax-rpc.dev.java.net
> Subject: Re: Internal wscompile error from custom WSDL
>
> If you want to build a document/literal service that exposes an
> interface that takes multiple parameters, then you should use the
> "wrapped" convention. See my blog entry for more info:
> http://atmanes.blogspot.com/2005/03/wrapped-documentliteral-convention.html.
> The "wrapped" convention is also described in Section 6.4.1 in the
> JAX-RPC 1.1 spec. The wrapped convention makes document/literal look
> and feel like rpc/literal, but it's more interoperable (especially
> with .NET).
>
> To return an array of items, try defining the output message like so
> (using a bare array rather than a wrapped array):
>
> <wsdl:message name="handleItemsResponse">
> <wsd:part name=parameters element="xsdns:handleItemsReturn/>
> <wsdl:message>
>
> And define the response element like so:
>
> <xsd:element name="handleItemsReturn">
> <xsd:complexType>
> <xsd:sequence>
> <xsd:element name="item" type="xsdns:Item" nillable="false"
> minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
> </xsd:sequence>
> </xsd:complexType>
> </xsd:element>
>
> Anne
>
> On 5/4/05, Ryan LeCompte <ryan.lecompte_at_pangonetworks.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > I realize that for doc/literal web services you can only have one "part"
> for
> > each message to be WSI compliant. However, in the Test.wsdl file that's
> > included in this message.. If you make the getItems operation return an
> > array of items by adding an "output" element to the "handleItems"
> operation,
> > it always seems to generate an endpoint interface with "Items" as the
> return
> > type instead of "Item[]". Has anyone come across this before? It makes the
> > argument Items[] correctly, but not for the return type.
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Ryan
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> >
> >
> > From: Ryan LeCompte [mailto:ryan.lecompte_at_pangonetworks.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 2:04 PM
> > To: JAX-RPC
> > Subject: Internal wscompile error from custom WSDL
> >
> >
> >
> > Hello all,
> >
> >
> >
> > I'm running across various issues with the "wscompile" utility in JWSDP
> 1.5.
> > The problem mainly arises when I have a "message" element in my custom
> WSDL
> > that has more than one "part" inner elements (basically I want a generated
> > method with multiple parameters). I've written a simple test WSDL file
> that
> > can be used to illustrate the problem. Note that this is a
> document/literal
> > web service that I'm passing as input to wscompile so that the
> corresponding
> > Java objects can be generated. The wscompile command that I'm using is:
> >
> >
> >
> > wscompile -gen:server -model model -f:wsi -f:unwrap -f:documentliteral
> -keep
> > -s generated -d output/server -verbose -classpath . config.xml
> >
> >
> >
> > Note that I want the generated methods to use Item[] for method arguments
> > and not the generated "Items" object. The following WSDL file illustrates
> > the problem. If you take out the "param_two" from the message
> > "TestWebService_handleItems" then wscompile generates the proper
> artifacts.
> > However, if you add an extra parameter ("part_two") as the WSDL is
> currently
> > written, then wscompile outputs the following error:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [CustomClassGenerator: generating JavaClass for: Item]
> >
> > [CustomClassGenerator: generating JavaClass for: Items]
> >
> > [LiteralObjectSerializerGenerator: writing
> > serializer/deserializer for: Item]
> >
> > [LiteralObjectSerializerGenerator: writing
> > serializer/deserializer for: Items]
> >
> > error: generator error: internal error (should not happen):
> > tie.generator.002
> >
> >
> >
> > Note that it still appears to generate all of the proper Java artifacts,
> > except now the main endpoint interface that it generates uses the "Items"
> > object as a parameter instead of "Item[]". Is there something wrong in the
> > way that I'm writing the WSDL? I've also noticed that if I don't use the
> > name of the operation as the element name for the "Items" complex type,
> then
> > the generated endpoint interface uses "Items" and not "Item[]".
> >
> >
> >
> > Can anyone point me in the right direction here?
> >
> >
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
> > Ryan
> >
> >
> >
> > Test.wsdl:
> >
> >
> >
> > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> >
> > <!-
> >
> > File: Test.wsdl
> >
> > -->
> >
> >
> >
> > <definitions name="TestWebService"
> >
> > targetNamespace="urn:com.test.webservice/1.0.0/wsdl"
> >
> > xmlns:tns="urn:com.test.webservice/1.0.0/wsdl"
> >
> > xmlns:xsdns="urn:com.test.webservice/1.0.0/types"
> >
> > xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap/"
> >
> > xmlns="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/">
> >
> > <!-- Types: Provides data type definitions used to describe
> the
> > messages exchanged. -->
> >
> > <types>
> >
> > <schema
> > targetNamespace="urn:com.test.webservice/1.0.0/types"
> >
> > xmlns:tns="urn:com.test.webservice/1.0.0/types"
>
> >
> >
> > xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
> >
> > <complexType
> > name="Items">
> >
> > <sequence>
> >
> >
> > <element name="arrayOfItems" type="tns:Item" nillable="false"
> >
> >
> > minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="unbounded">
> >
> >
> > </element>
> >
> > </sequence>
> >
> > </complexType>
> >
> > <complexType
> > name="Item">
> >
> > <sequence>
> >
> >
> > <element name="itemIdentifier" type="string" nillable="false"/>
> >
> >
> > <element name="itemName" type="string" nillable="true"/>
> >
> > </sequence>
> >
> > </complexType>
> >
> > <element
> > name="handleItems" type="tns:Items" />
> >
> > <element
> > name="itemElement" type="tns:Item"/>
> >
> >
> > </schema>
> >
> > </types>
> >
> >
> >
> > <!-- Message: An abstract definition of the data being
> > transmitted. -->
> >
> > <message name="TestWebService_handleItems">
> >
> > <part name="param_one"
> element="xsdns:handleItems"/>
> >
> > <part name="param_two"
> element="xsdns:itemElement"/>
> >
> > </message>
> >
> >
> >
> > <!-- PortType: An abstract definition of the operations. -->
> >
> > <portType name="TestWebServicePortType">
> >
> > <operation name="handleItems">
> >
> > <input
> > message="tns:TestWebService_handleItems"/>
> >
> > </operation>
> >
> > </portType>
> >
> >
> >
> > <!-- Binding: The concrete protocol and data format for the
> > operations and messages. -->
> >
> > <binding name="TestWebServiceBinding"
> > type="tns:TestWebServicePortType">
> >
> > <soap:binding
> > transport="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/http"
> > style="document"/>
> >
> > <operation name="handleItems">
> >
> > <soap:operation
> > soapAction="TestWebService/handleItems"/>
> >
> > <input>
> >
> > <soap:body
> > use="literal"/>
> >
> > </input>
> >
> > </operation>
> >
> > </binding>
> >
> >
> >
> > <service name="TestWebService">
> >
> > <port name="TestWebServicePort"
> > binding="tns:TestWebServiceBinding">
> >
> > <soap:address
> > location="REPLACE_WITH_ACTUAL_URL"/>
> >
> > </port>
> >
> > </service>
> >
> > </definitions>
> >
> >
> >
> > Config.xml:
> >
> >
> >
> > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
> >
> >
> >
> > <configuration
> > xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/jax-rpc/ri/config">
> >
> > <wsdl location="C:/test/Test.wsdl"
> >
> > packageName="com.test "/>
> >
> > </configuration>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_jax-rpc.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_jax-rpc.dev.java.net
>
>
>