From: Wilber S. <wismar25_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 13:55:28 -0500

> Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 11:50:15 -0500
> From: manfred.riem_at_oracle.com
> To: wismar25_at_hotmail.com; users_at_javaserverfaces.java.net
> Subject: Re: JSF performance in GF 4.0
>
> Hi there,
>
> If you are using the same JSF runtime you should be seeing the same results.
>
> If you are not then please see if you are doing something with CDI as the
> CDI behavior has changed a bit between EE6 and EE7
>
> Manfred
>
> On 10/24/13 11:37 AM, wismar25_at_hotmail.com wrote:
> > Hi Manfred,
> >
> > I've tested with an application using jsf tags only, the time with GF4
> > is higher than with GF3.1.2.2, if the interface is more complex then
> > the response time is greater.
> >
> > I' was trying to check where is the problem in my app, especially with
> > complex interfaces, the profiler showed me this:
> >
> > GF3.1.2.2:
> > https://www.dropbox.com/s/7j8otrrbar6bfl3/Test1%20-%20GF3.1.2.2.png
> > GF4.0: https://www.dropbox.com/s/b5xr8qmmq3tmdzm/Test1%20-%20GF4.0.png
> >
> > I'm using JSF 2.2.4 in both cases, the time grew in the restore view
> > phase. How you can see in GF4 the createComponent is called (more than
> > one time).
> >
> > Maybe JSF is doing a different work depending from the server or some
> > library (GF3 for Java EE6 vs GF4 for Java EE7)