Ryan Lubke wrote:
> Raymond DeCampo wrote:
>> Raymond DeCampo wrote:
>>
>>> OK, I moved past the problem with the XSL transformation. The issue
>>> only manifested when I used the ANT that is installed with Fedora.
>>> When
>>> I downloaded ANT 1.7.0 from apache or used Eclipse to run the build
>>> script I got past this error.
>>>
>>> Of course, now I have a different error:
>>>
>>> compile:
>>> [javac] Compiling 199 source files to
>>> /home/rdecampo/java.net/javaserverfaces-sources/jsf-ri/build/classes
>>> [javac]
>>> /home/rdecampo/java.net/javaserverfaces-sources/jsf-ri/src/com/sun/faces/vendor/Jetty6InjectionProvider.java:41:
>>>
>>> package org.mortbay.jetty.plus.annotation does not exist
>>> [javac] import
>>> org.mortbay.jetty.plus.annotation.InjectionCollection;
>>> [javac] ^
>>> [javac]
>>> /home/rdecampo/java.net/javaserverfaces-sources/jsf-ri/src/com/sun/faces/vendor/Jetty6InjectionProvider.java:42:
>>>
>>> package org.mortbay.jetty.plus.annotation does not exist
>>>
>>>
>> This might be related to another issue I had earlier when first
>> attempting the build:
>>
>> update.containers:
>> [get] Getting: http://dist.codehaus.org/jetty/jetty-6.1.2rc0.zip
>> [get] To:
>> /home/rdecampo/java.net/javaserverfaces-sources/dependencies/jetty-6.1.2rc0.zip
>>
>> [get] Error opening connection java.io.FileNotFoundException:
>> http://dist.codehaus.org/jetty/jetty-6.1.2rc0.zip
>> [get] Error opening connection java.io.FileNotFoundException:
>> http://dist.codehaus.org/jetty/jetty-6.1.2rc0.zip
>> [get] Error opening connection java.io.FileNotFoundException:
>> http://dist.codehaus.org/jetty/jetty-6.1.2rc0.zip
>> [get] Can't get http://dist.codehaus.org/jetty/jetty-6.1.2rc0.zip
>> to
>> /home/rdecampo/java.net/javaserverfaces-sources/dependencies/jetty-6.1.2rc0.zip
>>
>>
>>
>> I ended up downloaded the file by hand from
>> http://dist.codehaus.org/jetty/jetty-6.1.x/jetty-6.1.2rc0.zip in order
>> to proceed.
>>
> Yes, I've noticed the download fails from time to time when hudson is
> building the RI.
> It usually clears itself up after a bit.
>
> Sorry that you had issue with the build. Normally it's very straight
> forward.
I'm still having the compilation error above (I didn't mean to imply it
was fixed, but I thought the two separate issues might be related).