dev@javaserverfaces.java.net

Re: JAVASERVERFACES-3939

From: manfred riem <manfred.riem_at_oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 08:40:18 -0600

Hi Kito,

Those beans are not placed in request scoped so that message would be
incorrect.

Their behavior degrades to what effectively amounts to request scope.

Thanks!

Kind regards,
Manfred Riem

On 1/15/16, 9:01 AM, Kito Mann wrote:
> Xavier is right about the message, too; it's confusing. At the very
> least, it should say "View [xyz] has been marked as stateless; any
> @ViewScoped beans will be placed in request scope."
>
> ___
>
> Kito D. Mann | @kito99 | Author, JSF in Action
> Web Components, Polymer, JSF, PrimeFaces, Java EE, and Liferay
> training and consulting
> Virtua, Inc. | virtua.tech <http://virtua.tech>
> JSFCentral.com <http://JSFCentral.com> | @jsfcentral
> +1 203-998-0403
>
> * Listen to the Enterprise Java Newscast: _http://
> <http://blogs.jsfcentral.com/JSFNewscast/>enterprisejavanews.com
> <http://ww.enterprisejavanews.com>_
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 2:32 PM, Lenny Primak <lprimak_at_hope.nyc.ny.us
> <mailto:lprimak_at_hope.nyc.ny.us>> wrote:
>
> This issue and solutino seem pretty reasonable (and easy!) to me.
>
> > On Jan 14, 2016, at 10:19 AM, kalgon_at_hotmail.com
> <mailto:kalgon_at_hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Could some administator re-evaluate JAVASERVERFACES-3939?
> >
> > I really think it has been closed without understanding what the
> > problem was.
> >
> > I've added everything I could to make it clear what the problem
> was but
> > as the issue is closed, I'm afraid nobody will even take a look
> at it.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Xavier
> >
>
>