>>>>> On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 12:33:21 -0800, Jim Driscoll <Jim.Driscoll_at_Sun.COM> said:
JD> Well, we try not to change publicly facing APIs - any chance of having
JD> the old filter class still there as a proxy to the new one, so existing
JD> apps continue to work? I'd prefer not to break existing apps with a dot
JD> dot release, even if the fix is a single line of configuration.
JD> Otherwise, no objection.
Thanks for doing this. This is very important work, Jason. I agree
with Jim that I'd like to have just the old filter there.
Ed
--
| ed.burns_at_sun.com | office: 408 884 9519 OR x31640
| homepage: | http://ridingthecrest.com/