Ed, what is the advantage of storing it in Application scope in some cases?
Ken
Jason Lee wrote:
> +1 for session by default
>
> On 12/9/09 11:33 AM, Kito Mann wrote:
>> Makes sense to me. I think the default should probably true, though.
>> ---
>> Kito D. Mann | twitter: kito99 | Author, JSF in Action
>> Virtua, Inc. | http://www.virtua.com | JSF/Java EE training and
>> consulting
>> http://www.JSFCentral.com - JavaServer Faces FAQ, news, and info |
>> twitter: jsfcentral
>> +1 203-404-4848 x3
>>
>> JSF Summit Conference Dec 1st-4th in Orlando: http://www.jsfsummit.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 12:30 PM, Ed Burns<Ed.Burns_at_sun.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Sebastian Henebruenner brought up an issue with using the Flash in
>>> clustered applications. He correctly points out that putting the flash
>>> in Application scope, as I do, doesn't work with clustering.
>>>
>>> I think the way to go here is a context-param.
>>>
>>> com.sun.faces.STORE_FLASH_IN_SESSION
>>>
>>> If defined and true, store the flash in the session, otherwise store
>>> flash in the application.
>>>
>>> What do you think?
>>>
>>> Ed
>>>
>>> --
>>> | ed.burns_at_sun.com | office: 408 884 9519 OR x31640
>>> | homepage: | http://ridingthecrest.com/
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_javaserverfaces.dev.java.net
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_javaserverfaces.dev.java.net
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_javaserverfaces.dev.java.net
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_javaserverfaces.dev.java.net
>>
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_javaserverfaces.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_javaserverfaces.dev.java.net
>