>>>>> On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 11:29:51 +0100, Jan-Kees van Andel <jankeesvanandel_at_gmail.com> said:
JA> That's true. I only added the code snippet for clarification.
JA> Whether or not this will be picked up in a more generic way doesn't
JA> matter that much to me.
JA> But before "overdesiging" this, it might be useful to think of other
JA> use cases besides the one in the original issue. It would not be the
JA> first "too generic" API in Java.
JA> With only one use case (the one posted), I think a simple utility
JA> class will probably work fine.
Of course. One use case is not enough, but there are others already.
For example, is EL 1.3 available?
I've filed an issue for this.
https://javaserverfaces-spec-public.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=669
Ed
--
| ed.burns_at_sun.com | office: 408 884 9519 OR x31640
| homepage: | http://ridingthecrest.com/