>>>>> On Mon, 09 Feb 2009 08:20:03 -0800, Ryan Lubke <Ryan.Lubke_at_Sun.COM> said:
RL> Ed Burns wrote:
>>>>>>> On Fri, 06 Feb 2009 20:26:08 -0600, Jason Lee <jason_at_steeplesoft.com> said:
>>>>>>>
>>
JL> Thanks, Ryan. All tests passing. Code committed.
JL> Ed: not sure we confirmed: Would you like to see a JSP
JL> implementation of this? I can try to get that done and committed by
JL> Monday, but I can't promise.
>>
>> Yes, I would, but any time this week is fine.
>>
>> Ryan, I think this is a valuable enough feature to warrant the simple
>> work that Jason would do to expose this to JSP users.
>>
>> I mean, this feature is eminently useful. For example, JSP users get
>> multi-component validation for free with this feature. Yes, they have
>> to be aware of differences in the lifecycle, but we'll make that clear
>> in the spec and documentation.
>>
>> Ed
>>
>>
>>
RL> I'm -1 on this. Some of the events that could be used won't work
RL> correctly in a JSP environment due to tree creation differences.
RL> We've scoped the new feature creep for JSP, for the most part,
RL> to be new features on existing tags and I'd prefer to keep it that way
RL> We want people to migrate to Facelets - not give them reasons to
RL> stay on JSP.
Ok, I'll stand down.
Ed
--
| ed.burns_at_sun.com | office: 408 884 9519 OR x31640
| homepage: | http://ridingthecrest.com/