Re: Comments on the Ajax code.

From: Jim Driscoll <Jim.Driscoll_at_Sun.COM>
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2008 10:03:47 -0700

Ed Burns wrote:
> JD> We'll have to fix this, before ship, I think. I'm loath to just do it
> JD> since it will have an API impact. If you want me to just do it and
> JD> report back, let me know.
> I think you should do this, but Roger has the final say.

Talked with Roger, I'll be making these changes.

> JD> Also, though we register ourselves with the OpenAjax library, we don't
> JD> actually use the pub/sub hub. We should, I think, plan to, as part of
> JD> the Observer object.
> Yes, we definately should.

That'll probably have to wait until after ship - which is fine, it's an
implementation detail.