Yes, that would solve the singlton problem, but would h:body be more
extensible than f:view?
jim
Ken Paulsen wrote:
>
> If it's not a separate component, then I think I'd prefer it to be on a
> "body" tag, which I think is planned for v2.0.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Ken
>
> Jim Driscoll wrote:
>>
>>
>> Ken Paulsen wrote:
>>>
>>> I think I'd prefer it not be an f:view attribute in 2.0. If a
>>> component library decides to override or extend this functionality,
>>> I'm not sure they can do that with f:view. But that's just my
>>> preference. ;)
>>>
>>> Ken
>>
>> That's a good point. The idea behind putting it there was that
>> there's only one focus per view, and that's a way of enforcing that.
>> Do you have any idea of how you'd like it to be instead?
>>
>> Jim
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_javaserverfaces.dev.java.net
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_javaserverfaces.dev.java.net
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_javaserverfaces.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_javaserverfaces.dev.java.net
>