cool.
I was meaning that 'll do a "nicer" report on our side.
but in the RI it works as well :-)
-M
On Jan 9, 2008 6:46 AM, Ryan Lubke <Ryan.Lubke_at_sun.com> wrote:
> Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> > Looks like in the JDev-Design-Time, I am not
> > able to reproduce it;
> >
> > I guess we might just log a warning that the app couldn't init "correct",
> > in case
> >
> > ApplicationFactory factory = (ApplicationFactory)
> > FactoryFinder.getFactory(FactoryFinder.APPLICATION_FACTORY);
> > Application application = factory.getApplication();
> >
> > throws any exception.
> >
> > -M
> >
> I've corrected the error reporting. An exception will be thrown with
> an error message detailing the problem.
>
>
>
> > On Jan 7, 2008 3:06 PM, Ryan Lubke <Ryan.Lubke_at_sun.com> wrote:
> >
> >> The ApplicationAssociate throws the NPE as the FacesContext we provide
> >> during initialization isn't
> >> available.
> >>
> >> So, based on the info provided, it seems the Filter is initializing on
> >> its own thread after the JSF factories have been initialized
> >> but before the application object has been called for to be initialized
> >> by the config thread where the FacesContext
> >> exists.
> >>
> >> What container are they running on?
> >>
> >>
> >> Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> >>
> >>> from an init() of a Filter.
> >>>
> >>> On Jan 7, 2008 10:10 PM, Ryan Lubke <Ryan.Lubke_at_sun.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> this code:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ApplicationFactory factory = (ApplicationFactory)
> >>>>> FactoryFinder.getFactory(FactoryFinder.APPLICATION_FACTORY);
> >>>>> Application application = factory.getApplication();
> >>>>>
> >>>>> did throw this error:
> >>>>> java.lang.NullPointerException
> >>>>> at com.sun.faces.application.ApplicationAssociate.<init>(ApplicationAssociate.
> >>>>> java:143)
> >>>>> at com.sun.faces.application.ApplicationImpl.<init>(ApplicationImpl.java:132)
> >>>>> at com.sun.faces.application.ApplicationFactoryImpl.getApplication(Application
> >>>>> FactoryImpl.java:97)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I haven't observed this myself, but a customer did report it.
> >>>>> So, just curios, if some of you saw this already...
> >>>>> (looks like 1.2_04-b10-p01 was used)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>> Matthias
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> Where/when are they calling this code?
> >>>>
> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_javaserverfaces.dev.java.net
> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_javaserverfaces.dev.java.net
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_javaserverfaces.dev.java.net
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_javaserverfaces.dev.java.net
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_javaserverfaces.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_javaserverfaces.dev.java.net
>
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org