Hi guys,
this mail on the Trinidad list ([1]) lead me to the following issue.
In Trinidad, we extend the standard validators, like the
doubleRangeValidator, but the "logic" of the validate is inherited.
Inside of save/restore State methods, we delegate to the FacesBean
instance, which takes care of saving / restoring all properties, like
maximum or some Trinidad extra properties like "messageDetailMaximum".
See [2] for the full source code.
When using Trinidad on top of the RI (and client side validation is
DISABLED), there are some issues (see [1]). It looks like there is a
private property used the the RI (DoubleRange)Validator to indicate if
maximum or minimum has been set (and these properties are also saved /
restored). Since this is private, it's "odd" to add this property to
Trinidad's (DoubleRange)Validator as well, to get it working with the
RI, isnt' it ?
I checked the MyFaces IMPL code of (DoubleRange)Validator (see [3])
and it doesn't use such a property. So here, this combination (MyFaces
+ Trinidad (client validation DISABLED)) works.
What do you think about this ?
Do you want me to file an issue ?
Thx,
Matthias
[1]
http://www.mail-archive.com/users@myfaces.apache.org/msg42199.html
[2]
http://tinyurl.com/22ojtz
[3]
http://tinyurl.com/3bvsdb
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org