dev@javaserverfaces.java.net

RE: Re: [REVIEW/632] Server-side state saving sensitive to model changes

From: Ed Burns <ed.burns_at_sun.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 05:53:31 -0700

>>>>> On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 11:32:22 +0200, "Jesse Alexander (KSFH 323)" <alexander.jesse_at_credit-suisse.com> said:

JA> +1 from me too on not making the serialization default. Serialization is
JA> way too costly.

I cast my lot with Herr Jesse and Mr. Winer. I too would like to see a
quantitative rationale, other than parity with the client side model.

Also, Herr Jesse, don't say "+1 for not making..." It would be more
clear to say "-1". Being an unrepentant email skimmer, when I see "+1"
on a thread, I assume you agree with the proposal.

Thanks,

Ed


-- 
| 156 Business Days until JavaOne 2008
| ed.burns_at_sun.com  | office: 408 884 9519 OR x31640
| homepage:         | http://purl.oclc.org/NET/edburns/
| aim: edburns0sunw | iim: ed.burns_at_sun.com