Re: [Fwd: RI Sandbox]

From: Ed Burns <>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 10:26:55 -0800

>>>>> On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 13:36:29 -0700, Ryan Lubke <Ryan.Lubke_at_Sun.COM> said:

RL> wrote:
>> How would this relate to jsf-ext? I thought Ed wanted that to be the home of these kinds of things?
RL> In some cases, like the NavigationHandler, there would be an RI
RL> dependency, so it makes sense to
RL> have it in an RI sandbox.

RL> As to components, I've heard that Ed wanted to keep jsf-ext 'component
RL> free' (or something there-abouts).

Let me set the record straight on jsf-extensions.

I'd love to have Jason's components there. Everything in jsf-ext is
implementation neutral. Therefore, I think we need a sun-impl sandbox
as well.

I am happy to add anyone who already has jsf committer status to
jsf-extensions, no questions asked, and I'd really like to avoid
creating another place for people to look.


|  | {home: 407 869 9587, office: 408 884 9519 OR x31640}
| homepage:         |
| aim: edburns0sunw | iim: