>>>>> On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 13:36:29 -0700, Ryan Lubke <Ryan.Lubke_at_Sun.COM> said:
RL> jacob_at_hookom.net wrote:
>> How would this relate to jsf-ext? I thought Ed wanted that to be the home of these kinds of things?
>>
RL> In some cases, like the NavigationHandler, there would be an RI
RL> dependency, so it makes sense to
RL> have it in an RI sandbox.
RL> As to components, I've heard that Ed wanted to keep jsf-ext 'component
RL> free' (or something there-abouts).
Let me set the record straight on jsf-extensions.
I'd love to have Jason's components there. Everything in jsf-ext is
implementation neutral. Therefore, I think we need a sun-impl sandbox
as well.
I am happy to add anyone who already has jsf committer status to
jsf-extensions, no questions asked, and I'd really like to avoid
creating another place for people to look.
Ed
--
| ed.burns_at_sun.com | {home: 407 869 9587, office: 408 884 9519 OR x31640}
| homepage: | http://purl.oclc.org/NET/edburns/
| aim: edburns0sunw | iim: ed.burns_at_sun.com