Ed Burns wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, 12 Jun 2006 16:04:11 -0700, Ryan Lubke <Ryan.Lubke_at_Sun.COM> said:
>>>>>>
>
> RL> Roger Kitain wrote:
>
>>> Hello Stan,
>>>
>>> For features "beyond the spec", we do have the jsf-extensions project
>>> which is owned by Ed Burns. I'm ccing Ed.
>>>
> RL> I think in this case, modifications of the XSD would require something
> RL> different.
>
> RL> Stan -
>
> RL> The sandbox suggestion sounds reasonable to me. Could you provide a
> RL> small proposal on structure, and how it would relate to the existing build
> RL> environment (would there be options to include it by default, or would
> RL> it be a separate bundle)?
>
> I view jsf-extensions as the sandbox project, but I'm open to discussion
> on having a really light-weight sandbox project within the jsf-impl code
> base.
>
> Ryan and Stan, why do you not think jsf-extensions is a good place for
> this?
>
> Ed
>
>
I don't believe Stan said it wasn't a good place.
Since jsf-extensions is a drop-in addition to be used with JSF
implementations, I think introducing
items that break compatibility (such as XSD changes) shouldn't be there.