Re: Review: Put back marker logic (First iteration)

From: Ed Burns <>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 09:23:17 -0700

>>>>> On Mon, 16 May 2005 17:35:17 -0700, Jayashri Visvanathan <Jayashri.Visvanathan_at_Sun.COM> said:

JV> Hi Ed,
JV> If you have ideas on how to simplify this, please let me know. Based on
JV> that I can send another iteration of the change bundle.
JV> Thanks
JV> -Jayashri

JV> M com/sun/faces/application/
JV> Put back the state marker replace logic we used have before
JV> TCCI changes to enable components to be added programatically
JV> during encode.

Unfortunately, I don't think it can be simplified unless we allow the
user to tell us there are no programmatically added components during
render response. Actually, what do you think of adding a RI specific
init parameter that turns off the marker mechanism in favor of the
direct writing strategy?


|  | {home: 407 869 9587, office: 408 884 9519 OR x31640}
| homepage:         |
| aim: edburns0sunw | iim: