Hi Bauke,
Can you please verify this change stays inline with the master contract
of processValidators()
Thanks!
Kind regards,
Manfred Riem
On 12/29/16, 11:13 AM, Bauke Scholtz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> https://java.net/jira/browse/JAVASERVERFACES_SPEC_PUBLIC-1433 caused
> an undesired side effect of the current <h:selectOneRadio group>
> implementation: on a <h:selectOneRadio group="..." required="true">,
> the required message incorrectly shows up as many times as there are
> radio buttons of the same group.
>
> Therefore I have added UISelectOne#processValidators() method with
> below API rules to get this right, regardless of 1433.
>
> /**
> * <p class="changed_added_2_3">If {_at_link #getGroup()} is set, and
> {_at_link #getSubmittedValue()} is empty, and at
> * least one other component having the same group within a
> <code>UIForm</code> parent has a non-empty
> * {_at_link #getSubmittedValue()} or returns <code>true</code> on
> {_at_link #isLocalValueSet()} or returns
> * <code>false</code> on {_at_link #isValid()}, then skip validation
> for current component.</p>
> */
>
>
> If this needs more clarification, please let me know.
>
> Cheers, B
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 1:31 PM, Josh Juneau <juneau001_at_gmail.com
> <mailto:juneau001_at_gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the update Bauke, excellent work!
>
> Josh Juneau
> juneau001_at_gmail.com <mailto:juneau001_at_gmail.com>
> http://jj-blogger.blogspot.com
> https://www.apress.com/index.php/author/author/view/id/1866
> <https://www.apress.com/index.php/author/author/view/id/1866>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 6:08 AM, Bauke Scholtz <balusc_at_gmail.com
> <mailto:balusc_at_gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The <h:selectOneRadio group> is finally done. Encode was
> trivial, but decode was after all tricky if you have to take
> all possible scenarios into account. Two main tricks were done
> here: 1) include component's client ID in HTML element value
> and 2) create a SelectItem wrapper which delegates to the
> right index of the parent.
>
> API is done as per
> https://java.net/jira/browse/JAVASERVERFACES_SPEC_PUBLIC-329
> <https://java.net/jira/browse/JAVASERVERFACES_SPEC_PUBLIC-329>
> Impl is done as per
> https://java.net/jira/browse/JAVASERVERFACES-4188
> <https://java.net/jira/browse/JAVASERVERFACES-4188>
>
> Concrete use cases are shown in this comment:
> https://java.net/jira/browse/JAVASERVERFACES_SPEC_PUBLIC-329?focusedCommentId=392914&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-392914
> <https://java.net/jira/browse/JAVASERVERFACES_SPEC_PUBLIC-329?focusedCommentId=392914&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-392914>
>
> Cheers, B
>
> On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Bauke Scholtz
> <balusc_at_gmail.com <mailto:balusc_at_gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> FYI: I will take this issue on me.
>
> Cheers, B
>
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Kito Mann
> <kito.mann_at_virtua.com <mailto:kito.mann_at_virtua.com>> wrote:
>
> I like the passthrough approach, but we should really
> provide a tag too. There are still plenty of people
> who don't use the pure HTML syntax (especially since
> it's not supported by third-party component libraries).
>
> ___
>
> Kito D. Mann | @kito99 | Author, JSF in Action
> Virtua, Inc. | http://www.virtua.com | JSF/Java EE
> training and consulting
> http://www.JSFCentral.com | @jsfcentral
> +1 203-998-0403 <tel:%2B1%20203-998-0403>
>
> * Listen to the Enterprise Java Newscast: _http://
> <http://blogs.jsfcentral.com/JSFNewscast/>enterprisejavanews.com
> <http://ww.enterprisejavanews.com>_
> * JSFCentral Interviews Podcast:
> http://www.jsfcentral.com/resources/jsfcentralpodcasts/ <http://www.jsfcentral.com/resources/jsfcentralpodcasts/>
> * Sign up for the JSFCentral Newsletter:
> http://oi.vresp.com/?fid=ac048d0e17
> <http://oi.vresp.com/?fid=ac048d0e17>
>
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Edward Burns
> <edward.burns_at_oracle.com
> <mailto:edward.burns_at_oracle.com>> wrote:
>
> >>>>> On Mon, 28 Sep 2015 13:55:21 +0300, Cagatay
> Civici <cagatay.civici_at_gmail.com
> <mailto:cagatay.civici_at_gmail.com>> said:
>
> CC> I like this approach as well, better than what
> we have discussed so far.
> CC> +1,
>
> CC> So Bauke, do you propose we dont do anything
> since it can be already
> CC> solved with current APIs?
>
> I've asked the original poster, Ryan de Laplante,
> if he's satisfied with
> this approach.
>
> Either way, it's a pretty compelling endorsement
> of pass through
> elements and attributes.
>
> Ed
>
> --
> | edward.burns_at_oracle.com
> <mailto:edward.burns_at_oracle.com> | office: +1 407
> 458 0017 <tel:%2B1%20407%20458%200017>
> | 28 Business days til JavaOne 2015
> | 43 Business days til DOAG 2015
>
>
>
>
>
>