>>>>> On Mon, 11 Mar 2013 14:05:45 -0400, Andy Schwartz <andy.schwartz_at_oracle.com> said:
AS> Hi Ed -
AS> Although we have handed off our PFD to the JCP, it doesn't seem like the
AS> JCP has followed through on publishing the PFD. The jsr-344 page at
AS> jcp.org:
AS>
http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=344
AS> Does not reflect the PFD status of our JSR and the PFD version of the
AS> spec is not yet available for download.
AS> Do you know what is holding this up?
>>>>> On Mon, 11 Mar 2013 12:26:57 -0700, Edward Burns <edward.burns_at_oracle.com> said:
EB> There have been so many specs handed to JCP recently with all the EE7
EB> specs coming in, I expect it's just a backlog. However, I will send
EB> them a polite inquiry.
>>>>> On Mon, 11 Mar 2013 12:29:55 -0700, Edward Burns <edward.burns_at_oracle.com> said:
EB> Hello PMO,
EB> Can you please confirm that you have received the PFD of JSF 2.2? I
EB> sent it on 28 February.
>>>>> On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 23:44:24 -0800, Edward Burns <edward.burns_at_oracle.com> said:
EB> 1. javax.faces-api-2.2-PFD.zip (see attachment)
EB> 2. I assert that the full license terms which will apply to the Final
EB> Release specification, Reference Implementation and Technology
EB> Compatibility Kit have not changed from what was submitted previously.
EB> [...]
EB> In that email, I attached the spec as a zip. Perhaps it did not go
EB> through?
Ed