>>>>> On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:31:39 +0100, Jakob Korherr <jakob.korherr_at_gmail.com> said:
JK> Hi Ed,
JK> I uploaded the broken sample and added my comments to the issue at
JK>
http://java.net/jira/browse/JAVASERVERFACES_SPEC_PUBLIC-947
Looking at JAVASERVERFACES_SPEC_PUBLIC-947 and
JAVASERVERFACES_SPEC_PUBLIC-884, and your implementation of
RelativeResourceHandler, I have to ask the expert group if it's
acceptable to state that relative resources simply will not work unless
you are using prefix mapping?
Jakob, you made this simplifying assumption in your
RelativeResourceHandler and I can't see how we can meet your
requirements in the spec without doing the same.
Is everyone on board with that?
Ed
--
| edward.burns_at_oracle.com | office: +1 407 458 0017
| homepage: | http://ridingthecrest.com/