Hi Bauke,
Then we won't address it now.
Please file a spec issue so it does not get lost.
Thanks!
Kind regards,
Manfred Riem
On 2/13/17, 2:51 PM, Bauke Scholtz wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Not critical for the functionality at least.
>
> Cheers, B
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2017, 22:44 manfred riem <manfred.riem_at_oracle.com
> <mailto:manfred.riem_at_oracle.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi Bauke,
>
> Is it critical to have? Or can it be delayed to the next spec cycle?
>
>
> Thanks!
>
> Kind regards,
> Manfred Riem
>
> On 2/13/17, 2:41 PM, Bauke Scholtz wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> It has been proposed in the user mailing that a
>> jsf.push.addOnMessage(channel, function) function would have been
>> useful. I couldn't disagree this. It gives the enduser the
>> opportunity to register push listeners without polluting the
>> global scope, although the onmessage attribute supports a
>> namespaced function too.
>>
>> Cheers, B
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 10:23 PM, manfred riem
>> <manfred.riem_at_oracle.com <mailto:manfred.riem_at_oracle.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> As the start of the Public Draft Approval Ballot is
>> approaching (2017-02-21)
>> we have set this coming Thursday (2017-02-16 EOB PST) as the
>> last date any
>> changes coming out of the Public Review can go in. If any
>> changes come in
>> after this date we will look at them on a case by case basis,
>> but we cannot
>> make any guarantees.
>>
>> So if you have any remaining items that came out of the
>> Public Review get them
>> in as soon as possible.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Manfred Riem
>>
>>