jsr372-experts@javaserverfaces-spec-public.java.net

[jsr372-experts] Re: remove final from methods in UIComponent to make them proxyable in CDI

From: Edward Burns <edward.burns_at_oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 10:26:29 -0800

Executive Summary:

Ed pushes back on proposed API change.

Details inline.

>>>>> On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 01:59:16 -0500, Leonardo Uribe <leonardo.uribe_at_irian.at> said:

LU> Hi
LU> I'm exploring the posibility of make UIComponent instances CDI injectable
LU> for JSF 2.3, and I have found that some final methods in UIComponent
LU> creates a conflict:

LU> public final Map<String,Object> getPassThroughAttributes()
LU> public final TransientStateHelper getTransientStateHelper()
LU> public final void popComponentFromEL(FacesContext context)
LU> public final void pushComponentToEL(FacesContext context, UIComponent
LU> component)

LU> Can't we just remove the "final" modifier here? I know that in these cases
LU> it makes sense, but make UIComponent instances injectable in CDI seems to
LU> be a winning
LU> proposition to me.

That sort of signature change would break existing compile time
dependencies and cause build time problems. We can't do that at this
point.

>>>>> On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 02:14:42 -0500, Leonardo Uribe <leonardo.uribe_at_irian.at> said:

LU> I forgot to mention why this is really wanted. If UIComponents are
LU> CDI proxyable we could make "binding" attribute to inject a CDI
LU> UIComponent proxy and solve the problem when UIComponent instances
LU> are inside session scope beans once for all. That could be a big
LU> step forward for JSF.

>>>>> On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 10:34:05 +0300, Cagatay Civici <cagatay.civici_at_gmail.com> said:

CC> There are so many users who suffer from this issue for years, fixing
CC> this will be great.

While it is certainly true that users are suffering from the "binding"
issue, which has been present since 1.0,

>>>>> On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 18:25:54 +0100, arjan tijms <arjan.tijms_at_gmail.com> said:

AT> Components are indeed explicitly not injectable now. See also the overview
AT> table here: http://arjan-tijms.omnifaces.org/p/jsf-23.html#1316

AT> A little over a year ago I had been experimenting with this too, and what
AT> it basically needs (besides, indeed removing the final modifiers), is what
AT> I called a "FacesRequestScope".

You're not the only one. We tried to make UIComponent injectable and
ran into a lot of problems with state saving and the lifecycle. It's
too big a change at this point.

Thanks,

Ed

-- 
| edward.burns_at_oracle.com | office: +1 407 458 0017
| 36 business days until DevNexus 2017
| 61 business days until JavaLand 2017