+1
And it seems your constants include enums, right?
Herzliche Grüße - Best Regards,
Michael Müller
Brühl, Germany
blog.mueller-bruehl.de <
http://blog.mueller-bruehl.de/>
it-rezension.de <
http://it-rezension.de/>
@muellermi
Read my books
"Web Development with Java and JSF": 
https://leanpub.com/jsf
"Java Lambdas und (parallel) Streams" Deutsche Ausgabe: 
https://leanpub.com/lambdas-de
"Java Lambdas and (parallel) Streams" English edition: 
https://leanpub.com/lambdas
On 23.06.2016 18:54, Josh Juneau wrote:
> +1
>
> Josh Juneau
> juneau001_at_gmail.com <mailto:juneau001_at_gmail.com>
> http://jj-blogger.blogspot.com
> https://www.apress.com/index.php/author/author/view/id/1866
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 8:00 AM, Bauke Scholtz <balusc_at_gmail.com 
> <mailto:balusc_at_gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     +1 for it being enforced into <f:metadata>
>
>     Cheers, B
>
>     On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 2:59 PM, Leonardo Uribe
>     <leonardo.uribe_at_irian.at <mailto:leonardo.uribe_at_irian.at>> wrote:
>
>         Hi
>
>         I see, so it is better if it is set as part of faces-config.
>
>         Really there is a precedent of a similar tag. In tomahawk
>         there are t:aliasBean and t:aliasBeansScope, which are tags
>         designed to create temporal names for bean that are only valid
>         for child components.
>
>         This case is just similar, but for constants.
>
>         Other option I can imagine is make it in the same way
>         f:viewParam in f:metadata works.
>
>         <f:metadata>
>             <f:importConstants type="com.example.Gender" />
>         </f:metadata>
>
>         Then f:importConstants add the definition (which is in fact
>         metadata) to UIViewRoot. Since everything inside f:metadata is
>         read before the view is actually populated, things will work
>         fine (but note f:importConstants is enforced to be added
>         inside f:metadata, which has sense).
>
>         regards,
>
>         Leonardo Uribe
>
>
>         2016-06-20 20:33 GMT+02:00 Bauke Scholtz <balusc_at_gmail.com
>         <mailto:balusc_at_gmail.com>>:
>
>             I don't think using an annotation is a good idea. Usually
>             models reside in business/service (EJB) layer and you
>             don't want to have JSF dependencies over there.
>
>             Cheers, B
>
>             On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 3:36 PM, arjan tijms
>             <arjan.tijms_at_gmail.com <mailto:arjan.tijms_at_gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>                 On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 3:24 PM, Bauke Scholtz
>                 <balusc_at_gmail.com <mailto:balusc_at_gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>                     A faces-config.xml based configuration is a
>                     reasonable idea. Perhaps even better.
>
>
>                 And/or the upcoming @FacesConfig ;)
>
>                 Kind regards,
>                 Arjan Tijms
>
>
>
>                     Cheers, B
>
>
>                     On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Leonardo Uribe
>                     <leonardo.uribe_at_irian.at
>                     <mailto:leonardo.uribe_at_irian.at>> wrote:
>
>                         Hi
>
>                         Just as a comment, f:importConstants reminds
>                         me f:loadBundle, which was deprecated and
>                         replaced by a solution that loads the bundle
>                         from the faces-config.xml files.
>
>                         The problem about f:importConstants is how to
>                         set up the context where these constants are
>                         available. For example
>
>                         <f:importConstants type="com.example.Gender"  />
>
>                         <h:selectOneMenu value="#{person.gender}">
>                              <f:selectItems value="#{Gender}"  />
>
>                              <f:ajax ...../>
>                         </h:selectOneMenu>
>
>
>                         if the ajax is only for the component,
>                         f:importConstants can be ignored and the code
>                         will break.
>
>                         so, the "challenge" is to find a way to define
>                         the EL context properly.
>
>                         In MyFaces there are some EL contexts:
>
>                         - page
>                         - template
>                         - view
>                         - global
>
>                         Sometimes you want a definition to pass
>                         through the template, sometimes through the
>                         view or sometimes just have a global
>                         definition for all your views.
>
>                         regards,
>
>                         Leonardo Uribe
>
>
>                         2016-06-20 14:49 GMT+02:00 Bauke Scholtz
>                         <balusc_at_gmail.com <mailto:balusc_at_gmail.com>>:
>
>                             Hi,
>
>                             See
>                             https://java.net/jira/browse/JAVASERVERFACES_SPEC_PUBLIC-1424
>
>                             This is a commonly requested feature from
>                             the community. Several libraries have it
>                             implemented such as OmniFaces and
>                             PrimeFaces Extensions. It would be nice to
>                             offer a standard JSF solution such as
>                             <f:importConstants>. It's relatively
>                             trivial to implement.
>
>                             If there are no objections, I will take it
>                             on me.
>
>                             Cheers, B
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>