Hi Manfred-
To be honest, I haven't begun working on the implementation yet, as I've
been finishing up an article for Java magazine. I am submitting that
today, so this is next on the list. I have thought a lot about it and have
some ideas of how we can possibly support 1.8 date and time as well as
backwards compatibility. I will start there...I will send out my proposed
ideas to the list within the next day.
Main idea, add a new Faces parameter in web.xml to configure JDK date
preference. Another option is to add an attribute to the calendar
components that will allow for backward compatibility...but support JDK8
date and time by default. This will be the main discussion, I
believe...which to make default. If we make JDK8 default then it will
break all applications right away...but if we make JDK8 opt-in, then it may
be easier to push through.
Thanks
Josh Juneau
juneau001_at_gmail.com
http://jj-blogger.blogspot.com
https://www.apress.com/index.php/author/author/view/id/1866
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 8:52 AM, manfred riem <manfred.riem_at_oracle.com>
wrote:
> Hi Josh,
>
> How is the issue going?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Kind regards,
> Manfred Riem
>
> On 8/24/15, 2:01 PM, Josh Juneau wrote:
>
> Hi Manfred-
>
> Hope all is well! Certainly...please do assign it to me and I'll take a
> crack at it.
>
> Thanks for your time, it is appreciated.
>
> Josh Juneau
> juneau001_at_gmail.com
> http://jj-blogger.blogspot.com
> https://www.apress.com/index.php/author/author/view/id/1866
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 1:42 PM, manfred riem <manfred.riem_at_oracle.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Josh,
>>
>> Can I assign this to you?
>>
>> See https://java.net/jira/browse/JAVASERVERFACES_SPEC_PUBLIC-1370
>>
>> It should be fairly straightforward.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Manfred Riem
>>
>> On 8/18/15, 3:51 PM, Edward Burns wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Volunteers,
>>>
>>> Fellow EG member Josh Juneau has written a blog post about this, but to
>>> actually do it in the spec we need a lot more. I see that Cody Lerum
>>> has filed issue 1370 about it so let's use that. Can someone step up
>>> and make a concrete proposal about how to do this?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Ed
>>>
>>>
>