jsr372-experts@javaserverfaces-spec-public.java.net

[jsr372-experts] Re: [jsr372-experts mirror] Re: [JAVASERVERFACES_SPEC_PUBLIC-1203] Discussion

From: Kito Mann <kito.mann_at_virtua.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 12:48:39 -0400

+1 for E expert group, but this should be documented somewhere... I imagine
it can be frustrating for users.

___

Kito D. Mann | @kito99 | Author, JSF in Action
Virtua, Inc. | http://www.virtua.com | JSF/Java EE training and consulting
http://www.JSFCentral.com | @jsfcentral
+1 203-998-0403

* Listen to the Enterprise Java Newscast: *http://
<http://blogs.jsfcentral.com/JSFNewscast/>enterprisejavanews.com
<http://ww.enterprisejavanews.com>*
* JSFCentral Interviews Podcast:
http://www.jsfcentral.com/resources/jsfcentralpodcasts/
* Sign up for the JSFCentral Newsletter: http://oi.vresp.com/?fid=ac048d0e17

On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Edward Burns <edward.burns_at_oracle.com>
wrote:

> EB> But what about the reporter's assertion that the
> EB> javax.faces.INTERPRET_EMPTY_STRING_SUBMITTED_VALUES_AS_NULL parameter
> is
> EB> simply not effective in 2.2?
>
> >>>>> On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 12:47:30 -0500, manfred riem <
> manfred.riem_at_oracle.com> said:
>
> MR> Hi Ed, and the rest,
> MR> I am of the opinion that EL 3.0 broke backward compatibility and
> MR> it should deliver a fix so pre-3.0 behavior can be re-established.
>
> MR> We should not try to do that in our runtime as
> MR> javax.faces.INTERPRET_EMPTY_STRING_SUBMITTED_VALUES_AS_NULL
> MR> is already a source of enough confusion.
>
> >>>>> On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 20:00:00 +0200, Frank Caputo <
> frank_at_frankcaputo.de> said:
>
> FC> +1 for the EL expert group fixing this issue.
>
> Fair enough. Sometimes the sensible thing is to pass the buck.
>
> Ed
>
> --
> | edward.burns_at_oracle.com | office: +1 407 458 0017
> | 55 Business days til JavaOne 2015
> | 70 Business days til DOAG 2015
>