Hi all,
I have closed this as "Won't fix". Any other optimizations that could be 
done should be discussed in a separate relevant issue to make followup 
easier.
Thanks!
Manfred
On 1/26/15, 9:24 AM, Kito Mann wrote:
>
>
>
>     MR>> I would like to go ahead and close this issue as a "Won't
>     fix" as there is
>     MR>> a better way of addressing this without any specification
>     changes.
>
>     +1.
>
>
> +1
>
>
>     MR>> Thoughts?
>
>     I think there are some changes we can do about in some EL resolvers.
>
>     One that comes to my mind is the one that handles #{cc.attrs....}.
>     Section
>     5.6.2.2. there is a part when you need to return a Map, and that map
>     is resolved by MapELResolver, but that is not a good idea, because
>     this resolver is the last of the EL Resolver chain. It is also
>     necessary to
>     call FacesContext.getCurrentInstance() internally to evaluate the
>     target EL expressions. It would be better if this is still a map,
>     but we force
>     that another EL Resolver (it could be the same) handles this object
>     (using a class cast that check if the object implements some
>     interface). In that way, we can pass the FacesContext  instance to a
>     custom method that receives FacesContext as parameter, instead
>     use Map.get().
>
>     That simple change would increase performance of composite
>     components, improving the speed of the EL evaluation. We can't do
>     that without a change in the spec.
>
>
> +1 Definitely sounds like a good idea.
>
>
>     regards,
>
>     Leonardo
>
>
>     2015-01-22 12:33 GMT-05:00 manfred riem <manfred.riem_at_oracle.com
>     <mailto:manfred.riem_at_oracle.com>>:
>     > Hi all,
>     >
>     > I would like to go ahead and close this issue as a "Won't fix"
>     as there is
>     > a better way of addressing this without any specification changes.
>     >
>     > Thoughts?
>     > Manfred
>     >
>     > On 1/21/15, 9:19 PM, Leonardo Uribe wrote:
>     >>
>     >> Hi
>     >>
>     >> MR>>  I think caching the ELExpression becomes well uncessary.
>     Hence no
>     >> real action need from a spec perspective.
>     >>
>     >> I agree cache the values from the EL Expressions is not
>     effective from
>     >> performance perspective. The problem is it is quite hard to decide
>     >> when the value can be reused or not. In the case of
>     isRendered() you
>     >> can take advantage of the fact that most of the calls are done in
>     >> encodeXXX methods, but besides that you cannot do much besides
>     >> optimize the EL Resolver chain. In MyFaces there are a couple of
>     >> tricks for that.
>
>