>>>>> On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 09:35:40 -0500, Kito Mann <kito.mann_at_virtua.com> said:
KM> Ed, any idea why Google abstained?
In the interest of transparency, I can share this:
G> Google Inc. voted Abstain
G> Comment: Google leaves this decision to JSF stakeholders, which does
G> not include us.
Personally, seems sensible enough, though naturally I wish they were
engaging with JCP on specs where they clearly *are* stakeholders in
terms of the subject domain. For example, JSR-236 Concurrency Utilities
for JavaEE [1]. This API clearly overlaps with Google App Engine.
Ed
--
| edward.burns_at_oracle.com | office: +1 407 458 0017
| homepage: | http://ridingthecrest.com/
[1] http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=236