jsr344-experts@javaserverfaces-spec-public.java.net

[jsr344-experts] Re: [jsr344-experts mirror] [730-FacesFlows] Rule out using redirects with Flows in 2.2?

From: Ian Hlavats <ian_at_tarantulaconsulting.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 23:02:39 +0100

+1

On 2012-11-28, at 4:43 PM, Kito Mann <kito.mann_at_virtua.com> wrote:

> I'm in Andy's camp...
>
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Andy Schwartz <andy.schwartz_at_oracle.com> wrote:
> Hey Ed -
>
> Among other things, the post-redirect-get pattern can be useful for:
>
> 1. Ensuring that the location uri displayed by the browser stays in sync with the currently displayed content.
> 2. Avoiding form re-post warnings in response to back button activity.
>
> It is possible I am missing something, since I haven't actually read through the Faces Flows spec yet, but these seem generally important to me.
>
> What is the rationale for disallowing redirects within Faces Flows?
>
> Andy
>
>
> On 11/27/12 2:59 PM, Edward Burns wrote:
> Hello Volunteers,
>
> I'm working to write the spec text for Faces Flows and I would like to
> see if it is acceptable to declare that using faces flows with <redirect /> navigation rules can be taken off the table for JSF 2.2.
> Does anyone have a problem with doing that?
>
> David Schneider or Rossen Stoyanchev, can you comment on if this is
> acceptable or not?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ed
>
>
>