Hello Neil, no problem -- just sent an e-mail. However, I believe his tool
actually uses the standard custom tag-based template approach.
___
Kito D. Mann | twitter: kito99 | Author, JSF in Action
Virtua, Inc. |
http://www.virtua.com | JSF/Java EE training and consulting
http://www.JSFCentral.com - JavaServer Faces FAQ, news, and info | twitter:
jsfcentral
+1 203-404-4848 x246
* Join me at JAXConf with JSF Summit July 9-12 in San Francisco (JSF,
Android, Cloud, Big Data, Java EE, and more):
http://jaxconf.com/2012
* Listen to the latest headlines in the JSF and Java EE newscast:
http://blogs.jsfcentral.com/roller/editorsdesk/category/JSF+and+Java+EE+Newscast
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Neil Griffin <
neil.griffin_at_portletfaces.org> wrote:
> Hi Kito,
>
> I've had the same experience as you. But could you reach out to Ian
> Hlavats and see what he thinks? I bet he might have an interesting view
> because of his JSFToolbox Dreamweaver plugin expertise.
>
> Neil
>
> On Jun 25, 2012, at 9:29 AM, Kito Mann wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Andy Schwartz <andy.schwartz_at_oracle.com>wrote:
>
>> **
>>
>> Oh, I didn't really notice much in the way of opposition. Maybe I missed
>> something? Seems like so far folks on this thread have been generally
>> supporting of the ideas that we have been discussing.
>>
>> Now I am curious: anyone out there finding the notion of trying to
>> optimize the JSF authoring experience for HTML-centric users to be a bad
>> idea?
>>
>
> I don't think it's necessarily a bad idea, but I rarely encounter anyone
> who's interested in it. Perhaps that's just because I work with Java
> developers, and very few of these shops have dedicated design staff.
>
> - Kito
>
>
>