>>>>> On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 17:59:41 +0100, "Andy Bosch" <andy.bosch_at_jsf-forum.de> said:
AB> I think "task flow" is a bit dangerous. I mean, JSF is an
AB> _UI_ framework, business logic should be implemented somewhere else.
AB> And having "tasks" inside JSF could inidcate we are aiming to do
AB> complex service logic inside JSF.
AB> I prefer the term "Faces Flow", but "flowlet" is fine as well.
Resolved, we'll go back to "Faces Flow" as listed in the November 2011
JSF 2.2 Early Draft Review. Now, let's please get to the hard work of
actually specifying this thing!
Ed
--
| edward.burns_at_oracle.com | office: +1 407 458 0017
| homepage: | http://ridingthecrest.com/