Also +1 to Leos proposal, now that I think of it, in Weblets the
relative resource mapping
was only working because I enforced a prefx mapping for the weblet
resources.
It always was something like /weblets/....
Never cared about postfix mapping.
Werner
Am 04.03.12 16:54, schrieb Jakob Korherr:
> Hi,
>
>> In theory with servlet 3.0, use prefix mapping only to handle resource
>> shouldn't be a problem, because you can register it automatically. For
>> example, if you are using suffix mapping, shouldn't be valid to
>> register /javax.faces.resource as prefix mapping? It sounds limiting
>> but only for servlet 2.5, but isn't just add some few lines on web.xml
>> only in that case so difficult?.
> This is a very good idea, Leo! Actually we could even go as far as
> "forcing" the developer to add a prefix mapping for the
> ResourceHandler in a servlet 2.5 environment, and automatically adding
> it (if not already present) in a servlet 3.0 environment.
>
> Regards,
> Jakob
>
> Am 2. März 2012 06:25 schrieb Leonardo Uribe<lu4242_at_gmail.com>:
>> Hi
>>
>> In theory with servlet 3.0, use prefix mapping only to handle resource
>> shouldn't be a problem, because you can register it automatically. For
>> example, if you are using suffix mapping, shouldn't be valid to
>> register /javax.faces.resource as prefix mapping? It sounds limiting
>> but only for servlet 2.5, but isn't just add some few lines on web.xml
>> only in that case so difficult?.
>>
>> By the previous reasons, I agree with Jakob.
>>
>> regards,
>>
>> Leonardo Uribe
>>
>> 2012/3/1 Edward Burns<edward.burns_at_oracle.com>:
>>>>>>>> On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 23:55:48 +0200, Ça said:
>>> CC> Using only prefix mapping sounds limiting. Frankly #{resource} does
>>> CC> the job for me.
>>>
>>> Thanks for weighing in! It works for me too. But there has been enough
>>> of a hue and cry for relative resources that I must respond with a
>>> feature.
>>>
>>> Ed
>>> --
>>> | edward.burns_at_oracle.com | office: +1 407 458 0017
>>> | homepage: | http://ridingthecrest.com/
>
>