On 8/1/11 11:15 PM, Leonardo Uribe wrote:
> Yes. I can do the necessary changes on MyFaces side.
Great, thanks Leo.
I have logged the following spec issue to track this:
http://java.net/jira/browse/JAVASERVERFACES_SPEC_PUBLIC-1028
> Until this moment
> there was no reason why change the code (see previous discussion), but
> if there is some use cases where do this is useful, it is no problem.
> After all we already have SKIP_ITERATION hint and
> javax.faces.IS_SAVING_STATE (In 2.1.x branch).
>
Right.
> I think we should implement javax.faces.IS_SAVING_STATE FacesContext
> attribute in 2.0.x to make it work correctly, is it correct?
>
Seems like we would either want to do that, or I suppose MyFaces could
introduce the tree visit based approach in 2.1 only (where the
IS_SAVING_STATE constant is available).
Andy
> regards,
>
> Leonardo Uribe
>
>
>> Andy
>>
>>
>>