On 5/14/11 10:23 AM, Werner Keil wrote:
> Btw, your input, especially from an Oracle-insider shows, there's
> still quite a bit of work to do on *Transparency *if you haven't heard
> about all this so far
>
:-)
Getting the word out to folks shouldn't be especially difficult. I
noticed that the minutes from recent OpenJDK meetings were making the
rounds after a tweet by @mreinhold:
http://twitter.com/#!/mreinhold/status/63343853830275072
Guessing a similar tweet from, say, @java (which already broadcasts
various JCP-related activity) would be sufficient to call attention to
the work of the JCP.next working group.
> Thanks for the suggestions. Shall I share them with the JCP.next EG or
> do you feel, there is a better way you might directly reach out to
> those at Oracle involved? AFAIK, other colleagues like Eduardo
> Gutentag joined the Working Group
Eduardo is definitely much more tied into Oracle's standardization
efforts than I am. My primary venue for raising JCP-related
questions/concerns has been jsr314 and now jsr344. :-)
> (as soon as the JSR is posted it'll become an official EG) so anybody
> who is a JCP member or works at Oracle with distinct interest and
> experience in some of these areas should be able to participate, at
> least as Observer, this is not restricted to current EC Members.
That's great to hear! I will plan on becoming an observer and hopefully
can provide feedback in a "users" forum. In the meantime, if you feel
that it would be helpful, feel free to share our exchange with the
working group.
Andy
>
> Werner