Linda,
I am fine for all 3, but the JSON and Websockets are more priority for me. Batch is of a lesser priority in my book. But if it made it in, its certainly not a bad thing.
Jeff
On Sep 17, 2012, at 2:27 PM, Linda DeMichiel wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
>
> Just to be sure -- all 3 in the Web Profile?
>
> thanks,
>
> -Linda
>
>
> On 9/17/2012 1:25 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
>> I indeed support those in the profile. I think they belong there at this stage.
>>
>> Jeff
>>
>> On Sep 17, 2012, at 2:23 PM, Linda DeMichiel wrote:
>>
>>> I'd like to get input from the rest of you on this item.
>>>
>>> Please???
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>>
>>> -Linda
>>>
>>>
>>> On 9/10/2012 5:04 PM, Linda DeMichiel wrote:
>>>>
>>>> We have a number of new JSRs in flight that we expect to complete
>>>> within the Java EE 7 time frame and that we believe are appropriate
>>>> for inclusion in the Java EE Platform -- namely:
>>>> * Java API for JSON Processing 1.0 (JSR 353)
>>>> * Java API for Web Socket 1.0 (JSR 356)
>>>> * Batch Applications for the Java Platform 1.0 (JSR 352)
>>>>
>>>> JSON-P 1.0 and Web Socket 1.0 are also both logically candidates
>>>> for inclusion in the Web Profile.
>>>>
>>>> Please let us know if you support adding these technologies to the
>>>> full Java EE 7 Platform and Web Profile.
>>>>
>>>> JSR full Platform Web Profile
>>>> ---- ------------- ----------
>>>> JSON-P [ ] [ ]
>>>> Web Socket [ ] [ ]
>>>> Batch [ ] [ ]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Note that we certainly would also like to include JCACHE (JSR 107),
>>>> Concurrency Utilities for Java EE (JSR 236), and Java State Management
>>>> (JSR 350), but at this time we are less certain about their readiness
>>>> in the Java EE 7 timeframe. Hopefully, however, we will be able to
>>>> ask you about their inclusion in the coming months.
>>>>
>>>> thanks,
>>>>
>>>> -Linda
>>