On 06/26/2012 11:18 AM, Linda DeMichiel wrote:
> You are right -- we haven't gotten to it yet. However, it is on the
> agenda for the JPA 2.1 JSR and
> is one of the items flagged in the proposal itself. I have been
> planning to put it next in the queue
> after we finish with the area of multitenancy and schema generation.
> (There has been somewhat of a
> hiatus in the latter discussion since I have been out of the country
> on vacation for a couple of weeks,
> but it should resume shortly).
Thanks. I'd seen a general reference to fetch issues on the 2.1
proposal, but given the lack of discussion and the brief mention of it I
was concerned it'd get missed. I didn't know you were working to a
specific agenda, though it certainly makes sense to do so. Is there any
formal agenda that's accessible somewhere or is it just a general
consensus of what you're thinking of looking into next?
Thanks for the reassurance that it'll get looked at. I'll keep an eye
out. I'll probably need to start monitoring EclipseLink's commits list
too so I can try prototypes of JPA 2.1 features out. BTW it also turns
out fetch groups did come up briefly in December 2011 as spin-off of
another thread. I must've missed it.
Good luck juggling Java EE 7 and all the competing wants and needs.
--
Craig Ringer
POST Newspapers
276 Onslow Rd, Shenton Park
Ph: 08 9381 3088 Fax: 08 9388 2258
ABN: 50 008 917 717
http://www.postnewspapers.com.au/