I do agree with this viewpoint. I think we should look to improve and
advance JTA rather than finding ways to work around it.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Linda DeMichiel [mailto:linda.demichiel_at_oracle.com]
> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2012 3:01 PM
> To: jsr342-experts_at_javaee-spec.java.net
> Cc: Pete Muir
> Subject: [jsr342-experts] Re: Fwd: @Transactional feedback
>
> Hi Pete,
>
> Our proposal was for JTA transactions, not resource-local. Application-
> managed persistence
> contexts should behave as they do today -- i.e., when createEntityManager
is
> invoked and a JTA transaction is active, the persistence provider
registers for
> transaction synchronization notifications against the transaction.
>
> HTH,
>
> -Linda
>
>
> On 4/30/2012 2:26 AM, Pete Muir wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > A question on @Transactional from Dan Allen, raised on the CDI EG. My
> > expertise in @Transactional is around the programming model, not the
> > transaction semantics, so I wanted to get an answer from the horses
> > mouth :-)
> >
> > Begin forwarded message:
> >
> >> Is @Transactional going to accommodate resource-local transactions or
> >> automatic enlistment for application-managed persistence context and
data
> sources?
> >>
> >
> >