Yes, sounds much better. I support this JSR
Antonio
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 11:41 PM, Linda DeMichiel <linda.demichiel_at_oracle.com
> wrote:
> Hi Martijn, Antonio, all,
>
> Please see the recent announcement on jdk9-dev,
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk9-dev/2014-December/001670.html.
> The JEP for lightweight JSON is being withdrawn from JDK 9.
>
> As our planned JSON-P 1.1 API evolves we will be tracking any
> developments in the future SE space with a view towards alignment.
>
> I hope that you will support the new JSON-P JSR and, should you have
> concerns about the evolution of JSON-P, hope that you will get
> involved in its expert group.
>
> regards,
>
> -Linda
>
>
> On 11/28/14 3:18 AM, Martijn Verburg wrote:
>
>> I forget exactly where I left this conversation with the OpenJDK / Java
>> SE folks, but we'd *like* to see the Java EE std wrapping around the
>> proposed Java SE one. EE should extend SE in this case.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Martijn
>>
>> On 27 November 2014 at 08:26, Antonio Goncalves
>> <antonio.goncalves_at_gmail.com <mailto:antonio.goncalves_at_gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> As an individual, I strongly support the two JSRs on security and
>> management.
>>
>> However, I have some concerns about JSon-P : I know there is a JEP
>> on having a "lightweight" JSon processing API in Java SE. What would
>> be the relationship between this JEP and the JSR ?
>>
>> Antonio
>>
>> Le 27 nov. 2014 09:07, "Mite Mitreski" <mitemitreski_at_gmail.com
>> <mailto:mitemitreski_at_gmail.com>> a écrit :
>>
>> Hi Linda,
>>
>> feel free to list JUGMK as supporter as well as myself as
>> individual supporter.
>>
>> JUGMK - Java User Group Macedonia
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Mite Mitreski
>>
>>
>> Java User Group Macedonia (JUGMK)
>> http://jug.mk | +38975236045 <tel:%2B38975236045> |
>> http://blog.mitemitreski.com/
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 8:51 AM, Alexander Salvanos
>> <salvanos_at_gmx.de <mailto:salvanos_at_gmx.de>> wrote:
>>
>> Hello Linda, Hello everybody,
>>
>> I am an individual member and (if possible) would like to be
>> listed as supporter of the Java EE Security API aswell.
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Alexander Salvanos
>>
>>
>> Am 27.11.2014 um 00:05 schrieb arjan tijms:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> My company, ZEEF, with myself as representative would
>> like to be
>> listed as supporter of the Java EE Security API.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Arjan Tijms
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 10:57 PM, Linda DeMichiel
>> <linda.demichiel_at_oracle.com
>> <mailto:linda.demichiel_at_oracle.com>> wrote:
>>
>> We have submitted to the JCP three more JSRs which
>> we are
>> targeting for inclusion in Java EE 8:
>>
>> * Java EE Management API 2.0,
>> https://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?__id=373
>> <https://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=373>
>>
>> * Java API for JSON Processing 1.1,
>> https://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?__id=374
>> <https://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=374>
>>
>> * Java EE Security API,
>> https://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?__id=375
>> <https://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=375>
>>
>> Please let us know if your company would like to be
>> listed as a
>> supporter of any or all of these JSRs. If you are
>> an individual
>> member of this expert group, please let us know if
>> you would like to
>> be listed as an individual supporting the JSRs.
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>> -Linda
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
--
Antonio Goncalves
Software architect, Java Champion and Pluralsight author
Web site <http://www.antoniogoncalves.org> | Twitter
<http://twitter.com/agoncal> | LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/agoncal> |
Pluralsight
<http://pluralsight.com/training/Authors/Details/antonio-goncalves> | Paris
JUG <http://www.parisjug.org> | Devoxx France <http://www.devoxx.fr>