jsr342-experts@javaee-spec.java.net

[jsr342-experts] Re: _at_Priority

From: Bill Shannon <bill.shannon_at_oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 15:11:19 -0800

Those seem like good ideas to bring up in the other expert groups, but I won't
be surprised if we're running out of time to do any of these in this release.

Antonio Goncalves wrote on 12/08/12 22:10:
> Would it be possible to prioritize @Singletons at @Startup for example instead
> of using @Depends :
>
> @Singleton
> @Startup
> @Priority(100)
> public class MyVeryFirstSingleton {}
>
> @Singleton
> @Startup
> @Priority(4500)
> public class MyVeryLastSingleton {}
>
> If yes, what about servlets ?
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 6:31 AM, Bill Shannon <bill.shannon_at_oracle.com
> <mailto:bill.shannon_at_oracle.com>> wrote:
>
> Antonio Goncalves wrote on 12/08/2012 03:23 AM:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Why would such annotation be in the Commons Annotations JSR
> (javax.annotation
> > package I suppose) instead of javax.interceptor ?
> We believe this might be useful in other cases as well.
>
> > If the Interceptor spec evolves (and it looks like it, to a 1.2 I suppose)
> > will we be taking it out of the EJB JSR and create a new JSR just for
> > interceptors ?
> It's already a separate spec. We'll be updating it using the JCP Maintenance
> Release process.
>
>
>
>
> --
> Antonio Goncalves
> Software architect and Java Champion
>
> Web site <http://www.antoniogoncalves.org> | Twitter
> <http://twitter.com/agoncal> | LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/agoncal>
> | Paris JUG <http://www.parisjug.org> | Devoxx France <http://www.devoxx.fr>