Antonio Goncalves wrote on 12/08/2012 03:23 AM:
> Hi,
>
> Why would such annotation be in the Commons Annotations JSR (javax.annotation
> package I suppose) instead of javax.interceptor ?
We believe this might be useful in other cases as well.
> If the Interceptor spec evolves (and it looks like it, to a 1.2 I suppose)
> will we be taking it out of the EJB JSR and create a new JSR just for
> interceptors ?
It's already a separate spec. We'll be updating it using the JCP Maintenance
Release process.